Tag Archives: Musings from the Dream House

On Aging and Writing – The State of the Blog, Year Five

My friend Mrs. Grizwald mentioned once, “It’s funny how there are billions of the people in the world and only 365 days in a year, yet we are always delighted and amazed when we find out we share a birthday with someone.” It’s true. I recently discovered, while thumbing The Secret Language of Birthdays yet again, that I share a birthday with Myrna Loy. I’ve probably mentioned it to a dozen people since then.

As a great over-thinker, birthdays offer me the guilty pleasure of self-indulgent self-reflection. It’s not just the heat of August that makes me quiet and pensive, but the recognition that my year is about to begin again. I rarely run willy-nilly, but rather pick a careful path and to do so, every now and then, I have to survey the terrain. The funny thing is, the most significant insights seem to find me. It’s remarkable with the amount of information and observation that bombards me daily, that there are some things that hit at just the right time. That stick.

This year, about the time I started to be still and take stock, two men, writers both, stopped in to remark on aging. The first was F. Scott Fitzgerald. In a review of his essays, The Wall Street Journal noted Fitzgerald as saying that old people were incapable of self-improvement, “Almost barbarians.” And by old he meant thirty.

The next was David Foster Wallace in his collection of essays, A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again, “I’m starting to see how as time gains momentum my choices will narrow and their foreclosures multiply exponentially until I arrive at some point on some branch of all life’s sumptuous branching complexity at which I am finally locked in and stuck on one path and time speeds me through stages of stasis and atrophy and decay until I go down for the third time, all struggle for naught, drowned by time. It is dreadful. But since it’s my own choices that’ll lock me in, it seems unavoidable – if I want to be any kind of grownup, I have to make choices and regret foreclosures and try to live with them.”

Also in the Journal (the Journal offering some sticky stuff that week) was a review of Kurt Vonnegut’s Novels & Stories, 1963 – 1973. It was noted that in response to the question, “When may we expect your next novel?” following the release of Slaughterhouse Five, Vonnegut reported thinking, “Next novel? That was it. That was my novel.” This notion was very sticky.

About this time, I finished Jonathan Franzen’s second novel, Strong Motion. Franzen is one of my favorite contemporary writers. Strong Motion was like looking through a box of your college boyfriend’s childhood pictures. I recognized him, though he was not so lean. But I didn’t like the book and I couldn’t care for the characters and I know more about seismology than I ever wanted to. I’ve past feeling the need to finish an unenjoyed book, but I needed to know Franzen better. I took the book by spoonfuls and about three-quarters of the way through I realized that what it was showing me, the stickiness of it, was that writers mature.

There are books that I keep holding up to myself as the excuse to not begin, but they are not the beginnings. Like all other things, writing takes practice. At a book signing here in Kansas City someone asked Franzen about his process, and he said, spinning his arm like he was hitting the final chords in an air guitar solo, you just have to keep churning and churning until there is something.

I am insecure, anxious and dismissive of my writing. A middling talent. Something that could have been something, but will not; I’ve started too late. And, if I have a story to tell, I feel that it is one story, only mine, and if that is all there is to offer then it’s not really a talent. It’s dictation.

Still, I am writing in my head all the time. Turning the words for blog post or article or some other as yet undiscovered thing. It tumbles and tumbles and tumbles and then it sort of throws itself out onto the page. I don’t know how to begin if it is not finished yet.

But I believe that American lives can have second acts. Creativity and complexity do not end in one’s thirties. And even though I may be in a sort of active intermission, a vivacious mingling in the lobby rather than a full-on second act, I think it may be richer than if the same sort of momentum had converged for me at twenty-six. Middle age does not encompass only atrophy, decay and regret even among grown-ups.

So I’ve decided to ignore these words of Fitzgerald and Wallace and follow instead the implied message of Vonnegut, whom I care for least of the three. I’m 46 today. I’ve been writing Mrs. Blandings for four years. The exercise of sitting down and writing this blog every day has been remarkable. I don’t intend to quit blogging, but I need to try to write some other things. Some longer things. I’m not quite sure how that will affect what happens here, but I didn’t want you to think I’m losing interest. I’d just like to write something that takes longer to read than a minute-and-a-half .

In addition, I need to get my house in order. Literally. The moving out and the moving in to the house with no name has left everything in a jumble. I am taking a little time off. A week. Maybe two. But I will re-post some of my favorites here just in case you stop by.

You will never know how grateful and flattered I am that you make Mrs. Blandings part of your day.

rssrss      FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

The Significance of Petty Details

I stood barefoot at the kitchen island Monday eating pasta from a small, white bowl.  It was a recipe I’d requested from the night before.  We’ve avoided pasta and the like, existing on cold dinners and carry-out in an unspoken resistance to heating the kitchen, but crackers and pizza crusts were not satisfying my gluten gluttony and my husband agreed to boil and toil.

So I stood, the next day, enjoying again the snap of the peas and the bite of the pancetta, reading a hamburger recipe from Thomas Keller’s Ad Hoc at Home, which friends had made for us Saturday night.  The hamburgers had achieved mythical status in my mind and I needed to know just how difficult they would be to prepare.

I flipped through Keller’s book, soaking up both knowledge and olive oil while gnawing left-over ciabatta.  I breezed through searing and stock until I discovered the recipe I’d been looking for.  Our host, the night of the dinner, had asked, “Do you really think it makes a difference to grind the meat yourself?”  Well, yes, now I do.

It was a beautiful evening and we sat under white lights and fabric flag garland ironed and hung by their fourteen-year-old daughter.  We had dined together just a week or so before and had come around to my interest in astrology.  “You must have The Secret Language of Birthdays?”  “What?  I don’t.  Do I need it? Are you mocking me?”  “Yes, a little, and yes, you do.”  So in a reverse sort of hostess gift, they gave it to me and we read aloud our profiles after dessert.

“Those born on this day are not overly concerned with petty details, choosing instead to focus on the broad line, the big show.”

And as I read Keller’s recipe I wondered if this is why I am not a good cook.  Wondered if inherently I can’t attend to the pre-grind seasoning, to the careful not over-combining.  Wondered if this is why it is unlikely that I will create a dish as elegant as Keller’s or rooms as elegant at Frances Elkins’s.

All images Mr. and Mrs. Kersey Coates Reed home, architecture David Adler, design Frances Elkins from Frances Elkins Interior Design by Stephen M. Salny.

rssrss      FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

The Greens of Summer

When my babies were little Mrs. Green told me, “You can’t put sleep in the bank.”  When I had toddlers Mrs. Green told me, “Put the oxygen mask on yourself first.”  And a few years later, when summer shifted from splashing in shallow pools and long naps on hot afternoons to swim practice and baseball and two loads of laundry a day, Mrs. Green told me, “Lower the bar.”

She didn’t mean to parent less or lazily.  She just realized that it’s better to focus on what must get finished, to be bothered less by the mess and to slow the heck down.  So, there are dishes in the sink and likely a wet swimsuit (or two) on the floor, but there is also a final green paint swatch on the wall of the dining room.  We all have our own priorities.

Books, clockwise from top, Walls, Florence de Dampierre; The Colonial Revival House, Richard Guy Wilson; A Flair for Living, Charlotte Moss; Interiors, Mary McDonald; Elements of Style, Michael Smith; Vogue Living: Houses, Gardens, People; Regency Redux, Emily Evans Eerdmans; Wallpaper, Carole Thibaut-Pomerantz.

rssrss      FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Lazy Hazy Days

What if I had a month of one-a-days?  I tend to use about five images a post so that would put me at about a 20% workload for the summer.  (See how I’ve now stretched it from a month to over two?)  If I did, limit myself to one image a day that is, I’d have more time to lounge about on this pretty, airy love seat.  And love it, I do.  Stripes softer than crisp and the Bennison fabric on the wall – pretty as pretty can be.  And that punchy little pillow is just what I need beneath my head.  (You won’t mind if I prop my feet up on the arm, I hope?)  Oh.  Except it’s not mine.  Bother.

With all this time on my hands, I realize it’s been a long while since I’ve seen East Egg; perhaps this is the summer to go back.

Image, Luxe Magazine, Spring 2011, design Peters & Mbiango Interiors; photography Troy Campbell.

rssrss      FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Welcome to the Retail Revolution

Over Memorial Day weekend we were out in the Flint Hills with friends.  A guest at the party asked me what I considered the most intolerable trait, what was the one thing that would turn me off of someone immediately?  “Pretension,” I replied. “It makes me uncomfortable when people pretend they are something they are not.”

That weekend, the WSJ Magazine published a profile of Restoration Hardware and its co-CEO Gary Friedman.  (You can read the piece here.)  Friedman has stewarded the company to comeback.  From kitsch to something that reads success as sales are up.  Undoubtably, it has been a dramatic transformation from mass-consumer basics to Axel Vervoordt-land, though Friedman says he took no inspiration from the Belgian designer.

“We said, ‘Let’s forget about the customer for a minute,'” Friedman recounts as their philosophy for the makeover.  I find this an admirable start.  In tough times, “People need to be inspired to buy something.” So, with a clear go-ahead from the higher-ups, presumedly some capital to work with, Mr. Friedman preceded to copy Parisian chandeliers, 18th century Swedish and French chairs and Arne Jacobsen’s Egg Chair.

And it’s not as if I care, really.  I like Restoration Hardware.  I’ve bought cabinet hardware and lighting from them and have found them quality products.  It’s just disappointing when someone has the opportunity to really do something, to make an impact, and what he does is recreate the Sears & Roebuck catalogue.  For giants.  Or giants’ houses.  And call product designers “artisans.”

I agree that it is a good thing that if you are doing enough volume that you can offer linen that normally retails for $85/yd for $14/yd, that’s a nice service.  But to go on to say about your reproductions, “But is it better for the world if we make 50 or 500 of them, so there’s that many more people who get to enjoy it?” makes me think you have an inflated view of what you are actually doing.  Is it better for the world? I’d say it affects the world hardly at all.  It’s not changing the world; it’s making a buck.

Is it better for buyers?  Or “design?” Again, I don’t think it has an affect at all.  It’s just stuff.  And, no, I don’t think providing 500 of them (hundred?  thousands?) is better.  I would think creating really interesting, innovative product would be better.  Make something new.  Really create.  Craft something that someone will still want one hundred years from now.  That would be a genuine “transfer of happiness.”

Image of iconic Danish Modern chairs from Lars Bolander’s Scandinavian Design.

rssrss      FacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail